How can anyone defend that term that's used to describe the masses - "goyim" as an endearment? Even if these protocols are made up and not from ancient times, they sure do cover what the secret societies are up to. Therefore we should pay attention. Total destruction (The Sampson Option) is their final hooray. If they don't get their way. We can deal with this - but we must be smart and very strategic. Read the Architecture for The New Epoch which shows how we can change ourselves one sovereign at a time. Three pillars to get started -1. adopt a secondary calendar that you cite (in parentheses) whenever the Roman date is cited. 2. Adopt or start a local currency (now with digital tech this can be achieved easily) 3. Adopt the Egalitarian Proposal System to make decisions that affect multiple people. https://deniseward.substack.com/p/architecture-for-the-new-epoch
"It was the wealth used to establish the Roman Empire"? Um.. you may want to check that: The Western Roman Empire fell in 476, the Eastern Roman Empire was extant, and remained so till the fall of Constantinople in 1453.
I'm sorry, but weren't "The Protocols" proven long ago to be an anti-semitic hoax? Or did I miss something. My question is sincere and in no way do I defend the ongoing mass murder.
Depends on who you research. Apparently a number of intelligent, credentialled
individuals believe they're legitimate. But that's like Holocaust Denial: You don't speak about such things in polite company, or indeed most company, if you have any sense.
Trouble is up here in Canuckistan I soon could be facing life imprisonment for uttering "Hate speech" by doing so. "Holocaust Denial" already risks 2 years...
"(2.1) Everyone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes antisemitism by condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
That said, I believe I've read in various places that under the law, supplying evidence as to the truth of your position is inadmissible. Meanwhile the so-called "Holocaust" is so insubstantial it takes maybe 2 hours of casual reading online to destroy it. (https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/)
That said, this sort of thing in Canada is subject to the whims of the extra-judicial "Social Justice Tribunals", and I'll let Jordan Peterson answer your question for me:
How can anyone defend that term that's used to describe the masses - "goyim" as an endearment? Even if these protocols are made up and not from ancient times, they sure do cover what the secret societies are up to. Therefore we should pay attention. Total destruction (The Sampson Option) is their final hooray. If they don't get their way. We can deal with this - but we must be smart and very strategic. Read the Architecture for The New Epoch which shows how we can change ourselves one sovereign at a time. Three pillars to get started -1. adopt a secondary calendar that you cite (in parentheses) whenever the Roman date is cited. 2. Adopt or start a local currency (now with digital tech this can be achieved easily) 3. Adopt the Egalitarian Proposal System to make decisions that affect multiple people. https://deniseward.substack.com/p/architecture-for-the-new-epoch
Thanks for the restacks Tracy, Jerry & Warren!
• [Pt.8] The Rabbi's Report - The Main Tasks of Expanding Jewish Dominance - Oleg Platonov - ИСХС-NIKA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eAVIBn6_2yo/
"It was the wealth used to establish the Roman Empire"? Um.. you may want to check that: The Western Roman Empire fell in 476, the Eastern Roman Empire was extant, and remained so till the fall of Constantinople in 1453.
Good catch. That threw me off, too, but apparently not enough for me to stop and look.
Maybe it should have said, "Holy Roman Empire"? That could make sense.
I thought that too, but wasn't sure.
I'm sorry, but weren't "The Protocols" proven long ago to be an anti-semitic hoax? Or did I miss something. My question is sincere and in no way do I defend the ongoing mass murder.
Depends on who you research. Apparently a number of intelligent, credentialled
individuals believe they're legitimate. But that's like Holocaust Denial: You don't speak about such things in polite company, or indeed most company, if you have any sense.
Trouble is up here in Canuckistan I soon could be facing life imprisonment for uttering "Hate speech" by doing so. "Holocaust Denial" already risks 2 years...
Answering this properly would take me probably a page and a half. Here are the rubrics from The Criminal Code (https://www.unz.com/article/canada-outlaws-condoning-denying-or-downplaying-the-holocaust-mythos/):
"(2.1) Everyone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes antisemitism by condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction."
That said, I believe I've read in various places that under the law, supplying evidence as to the truth of your position is inadmissible. Meanwhile the so-called "Holocaust" is so insubstantial it takes maybe 2 hours of casual reading online to destroy it. (https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/)
That said, this sort of thing in Canada is subject to the whims of the extra-judicial "Social Justice Tribunals", and I'll let Jordan Peterson answer your question for me:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4-L0-s6llU&t=7s
Things have deteriorated appreciably in the 7 years since this was posted.