9 Comments

I have tried to understand the so called illicit drug world for years and feel the official version presented to the public leaves big holes. For a start how comes it still keeps growing year by year in spite of all the official declarations, funding, noise and publicity stands? And then there are the enormous sums involved leading to the suspicion that all those high profile law enforcement successes are a mere diversion... that the real money flows somewhere else... If you have done any research in that direction I'd like to know it..

Expand full comment

Agree with Poisoned Kiwi, Dean and hopefully can buy 3 of your books soon. From NZ thanks!

Expand full comment

Always enjoy you material Dean, and if I was working I would buy your books and subscribe. For now, thanks.

You might be interested in what a NZ politician was saying about Mendelsohn, Rothschilds etc. in 1933 as he fought the fraudulent creation of our Central Bank.

https://craighutchinson.substack.com/p/part-4f-a-new-zealand-central-bank?utm_source=publication-search#footnote-30-144282072

Expand full comment

Brother Dean, y'all are obviously more well read than I but I take issue with one issue jn particular:

"University of Chicago- which churns out a steady stream of far right economists as apologists for international capital, including Milton Friedman."

The University of Chicago is a Frankfort School not unlike The London School of Economics (birth place of Fabian Socialists and Frankfort Economics-actually birthed in Frankfort Germany). The Fabian Society are more fascist than "far right conservative". The Fabian Society logo is literally a Wolf in Sheep's Clothing. Frankfort, Germany was also the birthplace of Amshel Rothschild and moved his operation to London---The London School of Economics and in America, Berkley--(Janet Yellen taught economics there, was head of the Fed and hasn't a damn clue about economics), Columbia, The University of Chicago, NYU, Northwestern and several others---Hardly Conservative in any sense of the word. Bill Ayers attended University of Chicago and his lovely fascist wife, Northwestern---Barack Obama also allegedly attended U of C, Columbia and Harvard although his background is likely an Intelligence Agency construct and largely fiction.

Milton Friedman had some good and sound ideas regarding economics although he was okay with a Privately owned Central Bank---one of the key planks of The Communist Manifesto which pretty much destroys his "Conservative" credentials.

Keynesian economics is their school of thought and is absurd on it's face regarding economics--The fake economist from the NYT's, Paul Krugman pushed Keynesian economics his entire life and again---had no real clue about economics--He was a real clown, a mental midget and was wrong on pert near everything he wrote--not unlike Jim Cramer from CNBC. Economics and Political Ideology should never be in the same room---- but in their case---they are Married---largely to benefit their fellow like minded Thieves.

Alan Greenspan ONCE had a clue about real Free Market Economics until he suddenly embraced this Keynesian horseshit and set about to destroy the U.S, economic system. He once backed a hard asset based monetary system, i.e. Precious Metals/Commodies----until he didn't.

Be well--Merry Christmas and God Bless to you and your wife Jill.

John

Expand full comment

You've probably noticed by now that I'm a lefty when it comes to economics, no Keynesian either, but a believer in a much more mixed economy than we have. Banking, energy, insurance, food processing and mining would all be nationalized if I were in charge. It's the only way to break the cartels. But to each his/her own opinion. Merry Christmas to you & yours also John!

Expand full comment

Dean, a self described Progressive and I didn't know y'all lean left? I reckon I already knew but I truly believe we have much more in common and agree on more things than y'all would ever realize and you are one of the finest men I have come across in my life.

We both agree on one thing for sure--the "system" is crooked and needs a major overhaul. Nationalism concerns me as I am an anti-statist---The way I look ant it--the State is the problem and Statists....uhh..concern me. Too many crooks and thieves work for the State---generally useless types are attracted to Statism. Am I an anarchist? I dunno---maybe. The "State" did bad shit to my people so I reckon I tend to have a hard on for statists.

Personally, I avoid labels like Progressive as Progressivism is also a euphemism for Gradualism---Gradually going where? History has shown us many instances of that in practice-----Adolf Hitler described himself as a Progressive as did Joseph Stalin---we all know where that lead the world. Early 20th Century Communists noticed how that label tarnished their Statist, Authoritarian movement so they embraced--"Oh, we're Progressives now!".

I'd love to sit at a bar and shoot the shit with you Dean because I could go on-----we'd have a hell of a talk and a good time---(although I don't drink no more).

Be well my Brother----looking forward to your fascinating articles. I gotta buy some of your books toot sweet.

Night.

Expand full comment

I'd love that too Outlaw!

Expand full comment

Thanks for the restacks Bradley, Carole, Korby, Viesha, Lisa, ArtemisForestFairy, Laurel, Mary, PoisonedKiwi, Tracy & Merrick!

Expand full comment

Seems all species have natural pecking order, from ants, to wilderbeasts. The difference with us, the individual can recognise the process and transcend it. David Icke appears to be a good example. Like Judas, the whole system would breakdown if it wasn't for such roles.

Obe-Wan was another example. A great message via George Lucas's.

Expand full comment