Why was there no major debate this past decade, over real property law by law professors expert in the field, applying Klaus Schwab's Great Faux or Misdirection Debate over Corporations, corporate shares as property, and non-share (non-property) holders' alleged rights over Corporations non-owners (turning property law on its head)?
Over a decade or more ago, this faux debate of skilled mis-direction ended in "You will [must] own nothing and you will love it " ("We"/"WEF" insist!).
Why the gaping hole in the debate? Where were the emeritus professors of property law?
And apparently -- because I don't know for sure -- no one saw this slippery "end-run debate" around the "non-debate terrain" of real property, of anti-trust law and monopolies.
Instead of federal lawsuits to break up monopolies, we had Schwab's temper tantrum that the majority of people must own nothing.
II
But just to reach "You will own nothing", one HAS to go through or debate real property law. If not "go through," then destroy.
But the elites -- Schwabkin of Weffen SS -- "refrained from doing so." Apparently, because, again I don't know, they appeared to deliberately avoid the topic -- lest the public see them "lying in wait" to steal the planet.
Read the book
Thanks for the restacks all!
Dean,
Why was there no major debate this past decade, over real property law by law professors expert in the field, applying Klaus Schwab's Great Faux or Misdirection Debate over Corporations, corporate shares as property, and non-share (non-property) holders' alleged rights over Corporations non-owners (turning property law on its head)?
Over a decade or more ago, this faux debate of skilled mis-direction ended in "You will [must] own nothing and you will love it " ("We"/"WEF" insist!).
Why the gaping hole in the debate? Where were the emeritus professors of property law?
And apparently -- because I don't know for sure -- no one saw this slippery "end-run debate" around the "non-debate terrain" of real property, of anti-trust law and monopolies.
Instead of federal lawsuits to break up monopolies, we had Schwab's temper tantrum that the majority of people must own nothing.
II
But just to reach "You will own nothing", one HAS to go through or debate real property law. If not "go through," then destroy.
But the elites -- Schwabkin of Weffen SS -- "refrained from doing so." Apparently, because, again I don't know, they appeared to deliberately avoid the topic -- lest the public see them "lying in wait" to steal the planet.